Retrocedarea unei suprafeţe semnificative din Parcul IOR (actualmente Parcul Alexandru Ioan Cuza) între situaţia de fapt concretă şi dezlegarea instanţei de judecată în baza unui probatoriu insuficient. Excepţia lipsei de interes. Limitele rejudecării. Rolul activ al judecătorului

Retrocession of a significant area of the IOR Park (now Alexandru Ioan Cuza Park) between the concrete factual situation and the court's decision based on insufficient evidence. Objection of the lack of interest. The limits of retrial. The active role of the judge

Abstract

Every natural person has the right to a healthy environment, to free access for recreation in publicly owned green spaces. The retrocession of a public park violates the provisions of art. 10 para. (2) from Law no. 10/2001 regarding the legal regime of some buildings taken over abusively between March 6, 1945 and December 22, 1989. The court called to rule on the legality of the mayor's order to return a large area of a park must provide...