Inadmisibilitatea cererii de revizuire întemeiată pe dispoziţiile art. 509 alin. (1) pct. 11 C. pr. civ. atunci când neconstituţionalitatea dispoziţiei legale nu a fost invocată în cauza în care s-a pronunţat hotărârea atacată cu revizuire

Inadmissibility of the application for revision based on the provisions of art. 509 paragraph (1) point 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, when the unconstitutionality of the legal provision was not invoked in the case in which the judgment contested with revision was delivered

Abstract

The Court observes that upholding a plea of unconstitutionality produces effects mainly in the cases pending before the courts upon its publication, where the respective legal provisions are applicable, but in relation to the removal of the mandatory legal suspension regulated by art. 29 paragraph (5) of Law no. 47/1992, it may represent the ground for filing an application for revision both for the author of the plea of unconstitutionality granted, and for the authors...