Denumirea eronată sau incompletă a instituţiei de arbitraj. Rolul instanţei sesizate cu soluţionarea litigiului

C. civ. din 1864: art. 969, art. 1066, art. 1073; C. pr. civ.: art. 340 şi urm., art. 358⁶, art. 359, art. 363 şi art. 367; Regulile de procedură ale Curţii de Arbitraj Comercial Internaţional: art. 11, art. 12, art. 13, art. 29 şi art. 43 alin. (6) şi (8), art. 86 alin. (1) şi art. 89

Abastract:

The inccorect or incomplete indication of the institution of arbitration is a common deficiency in arbitration clauses. If such a clause is invoked nullty, the court is requried to identify the permanent arbitration institutions to which the parties have referred in their agreement. In the presend summarized case, besides the defective writing of the arbitration clause in the contract,both parts, both the applicant and the defendant agreed with the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania, conditions in which the arbitral tribunal...