CHIOMITA Gabriela, TABACU Andreea, Contestaţie privind tergiversarea procesului. Litigiu de contencios administrativ. Domeniul de aplicare
Articole
Publicare: Revista Romana de Jurisprudenta 3 din 2013
Tip: Jurisprudenta
Contestaţie privind tergiversarea procesului. Litigiu de contencios administrativ. Domeniul de aplicare
Contestaţie privind tergiversarea procesului. Litigiu de contencios administrativ. Domeniul de aplicare
Abstract
Challenge to the delay in the process. Contentious administrative dispute. Scope
Following the registration of the claim and the random determination of the panel of judges, according to the Decision of the Superior Council of Magistracy no. 161/2013, the case file is filed and submitted to the chairman of the panel by the established recommendation term.
If only the recommendation term was exceeded, and the court hadn’t taken the steps necessary for the regulation of the sue petition, as the case may be, according to art.200 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, or it did not decide its service according to art. 201 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, the presumption of art. 522 para (2) item 4 of the New Code of Civil Procedure would be deemed as incidental.
- Noul Cod de procedură civilă: art. 522-525
- Hotărârea Plenului CSM nr. 387/2005
Rezumat
După înregistrarea cererii şi...
Conținut complet disponibil după conectare pe Sintact