Contestaţie în anulare întemeiată pe dispoziţiile art. 318 teza a II-a C. pr. civ. Interpretarea noţiunii de "omisiune din greşeală"

Appeal for annulment according to the provisions of art. 318 the second sentence of the Code of civil procedure, The Interpretation of the concept "error of omission"

Abstract

One cannot discuss about an error "of omission" of investigating a ground of appeal, for the purpose of art. 318 the second sentence of the Code of civil procedure, in case the court of appeal upheld the enforceability of the provisions of art. 23 of the Regulation (EC) 44/2001, considering that, under these circumstances, the separate examination of the scope of art. 3 and art. 5 of the same regulation is needless, as the enforcement of these last legal provisions is removed according to the argument a contrario.

Rezumat

Nu se poate vorbi despre o omisiune "din greşeală" de a cerceta un motiv de recurs, în sensul art. 318 teza a II-a C. pr. civ., în cazul în care instanţa de recurs a...