SAFTA Adela Sorinela, POPESCU Lavinia, Clarificări în cazul termenului de preaviz de concediere ca termen de decădere obligatoriu potrivit Deciziei ÎCCJ nr. 8/2024
Articole
Publicare: Revista Romana de Dreptul Muncii 4 din 2024
Tip: Doctrina
Clarificări în cazul termenului de preaviz de concediere ca termen de decădere obligatoriu potrivit Deciziei ÎCCJ nr. 8/2024
Clarificări în cazul termenului de preaviz de concediere ca termen de decădere obligatoriu potrivit Deciziei ÎCCJ nr. 8/2024
Dr. Adela Sorinela SAFTA
Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Senior expert ANAF
Drd. Lavinia POPESCU
Bucharest University of Economic Studies,
Doctoral of economic school
Auditor Deloitte
ABSTRACT
As a result of some non-unitary practices of the courts, but especially for the application of the labor legislation in the letter and spirit of the recent law, the Panel for the resolution of the appeal in the interest of the law within the HCCJ was vested by the notification formulated by the People’s Advocate with the resolution of the appeal in the interest of the of the law concerning the legal issue regarding the non-unitary interpretation and application of the provisions of art. 75 para. (1) and art. 278 para. (1) of the Labor Code, related to the provisions of art 2553 para. (1) of the Civil code and of art. 181 para. (1) point 2 and para. (2) of the Code of civil...
Conținut complet disponibil după conectare pe Sintact